uploading a theme to WordPress<\/a>, has over 108,000 views and over 200 comments.<\/p>\nObviously, this video has been useful to a large number of people. This video, and a few others, make up the bulk of the 4,192 hours of view time on my channel last year. But, for many of these people, there’s no need to subscribe to my channel for additional content.<\/p>\n
How To videos are usually found through Google or YouTube search. They solve a problem in real time, and then people can be on their way. They’re extremely helpful, but are forgotten by these new YouTube benchmarks.<\/p>\n
I think that the availability of this kind of helpful niche content is the very soul of YouTube. I can\u2019t count the number of times I\u2019ve turned to YouTube when I\u2019ve wanted to know how to do something, and found some obscure video that solved the problem. The video was almost never created by one of the \u201cbig guys.\u201d<\/p>\n
There has to be some way to keep these types of creators\u00a0incentivized. Some of the most useful videos on YouTube are from smaller content creators who aren’t regularly updating (and thus not building a huge following).<\/p>\n
Why the money is important<\/h2>\n
A year ago, at the close of 2016, I had earned a meager $60 from my YouTube channel. It made me happy that I posted useful videos that was helping people, but those numbers didn’t really drive me to create new content. In 2017, I posted just one new video.<\/p>\n
But at the end of 2017, as I was looking over stats and numbers from all my online content for this past year, I realized (much to my surprise) that my YouTube channel balance was nearly $1,000. I didn’t realize I had made so much money because I hadn’t even properly verified my bank account in order to accept payouts, since I wasn’t even close to the payout threshold.<\/p>\n
The discovery of these funds made me realize that I really needed to put more focus on YouTube content in 2018. One of my goals for this new year is to create at least one new video per month. For video topics, I planned to dive into the commonly-asked questions on my current videos, in an attempt to help even more people.<\/p>\n
And then came YouTube’s change announcement on January 16th. Despite having a helpful library of videos, and earning a hundreds of dollars per year from ad revenue, I was being demonetized.<\/p>\n
As of right now, things are looking good for me in terms of hitting this new subscriber count threshold. I was at 800 subscribers when I first got the announcement, and I’ve been able to bump that number up to 937 as of this article’s publication. However, I know that there must be other channels that are in a similar situation as me. And demonetizing all their existing content is a great way to remove the motivation for creating new content.<\/p>\n
How YouTube can fix this<\/h2>\n
While I do believe that this new threshold is a bit high, I understand YouTube’s perspective on this change. It will allow the company to provide better support for creators in the YouTube Partner Program by limiting the amount of content that needs to be screened for monetization. It will also help declutter certain categories of videos, as it will be a lot more difficult for spammy channels to get paid for filling the site up with junk.<\/p>\n
But, as with the Adpocolypse, I think the biggest problem here is communication and support. For content creators who do fall into that one percent (making hundreds of dollars a year but still being demonetized), I think there should be some sort of manual override process. Allowing this one percent of users affected by this change to appeal the demonetization decision would be a great way to show continued support for the smaller creators who make the site great.<\/p>\n
If a content creator’s videos are getting thousands of hours of views, and have lively comment sections, there should be some way to have a human review the channel and possibly make an exception.<\/p>\n
There have been several new policy changes that YouTube has implemented throughout this past year, and each time it has alienated a large number of content creators, both big and small. I feel like several YouTubers are ready to jump to the first viable competitor. Let’s say some big company, like an Amazon, releases its own video streaming site with a monetization model similar to YouTube’s. Why would anyone stay on a site that doesn’t seem to care about messing with creator’s paychecks without proper communication or transparency? There are already smaller guys nipping at YouTube’s heels (i.e. Steemit<\/a>, Brave<\/a>).<\/p>\nYouTube is struggling to find the balance between keeping content creators happy and remaining marketable to advertisers. As of now, it seems to be pissing off everyone.<\/p>\n\n